Seismic Design: Past, Present and Future (INTERACTIVE)
Credit: 2 PDH
Subject Matter Expert: Farah Labib Eldib, S.E., M.Sc.
In Seismic Design: Past, Present and Future, you'll learn ...
- The background and progression of structural seismic concepts
- The relative merits of the eight basic steel-frame designs that have been used in multi-story buildings
- The evolution of concrete building frameworks
- The use of building configurations and contemporary high-performance seismic mechanisms for energy dissipation
Overview
Preview a portion of this interactive course before purchasing it. The course must be viewed on your computer or mobile device.
Credit: 2 PDH
Design of any building is a challenge for architects and engineers, and the challenge is made more complex when there is a need to provide for earthquake resistance.
During the past 100 years, seismic design philosophy and details have progressed from simply considering earthquakes to be the same as wind loads, to a sophisticated understanding of the phenomenon of the earthshaking that induces a building response.
This course covers the 100-year history of seismic structural systems, ranging from simple to sophisticated solutions. Basic structural behavior is outlined; guidance for selecting a good structural system is suggested, and relevant seismic issues are explored.
Specific Knowledge or Skill Obtained
This course teaches the following specific knowledge and skills:
- A summary of 100 years of structural seismic design
- Current and historical structural seismic systems, ranging from pre-1906 San Francisco earthquake to present day
- Three main factors that have impacted the progression of seismic systems selected by structural engineers
- The many variables that make it difficult to select an appropriate seismic system
- Why the simple building code approach to seismic design is often inadequate
- Why lateral drift that is too large or too small results in seismic performance issues
- “Pushover” performance comparisons of six different structural systems for a 4-story building
- Why energy dissipation is an important factor in a building’s overall seismic performance
- Energy dissipating concepts developed in 1976 at the New Zealand National Laboratory
- Seismic performance characteristics, including non-linear drift, energy dissipation and cyclic behavior, for twenty different structural systems
- Why building configuration is frequently the governing factor in the ultimate seismic behavior of a particular structure
Certificate of Completion
You will be able to immediately print a certificate of completion after passing a multiple-choice quiz consisting of 10 questions. PDH credits are not awarded until the course is completed and quiz is passed.
This course is applicable to professional engineers in: | ||
Alabama (P.E.) | Alaska (P.E.) | Arkansas (P.E.) |
Delaware (P.E.) | District of Columbia (P.E.) | Florida (P.E. Area of Practice) |
Georgia (P.E.) | Idaho (P.E.) | Illinois (S.E.) |
Indiana (P.E.) | Iowa (P.E.) | Kansas (P.E.) |
Kentucky (P.E.) | Louisiana (P.E.) | Maine (P.E.) |
Maryland (P.E.) | Michigan (P.E.) | Minnesota (P.E.) |
Mississippi (P.E.) | Missouri (P.E.) | Montana (P.E.) |
Nebraska (P.E.) | Nevada (P.E.) | New Hampshire (P.E.) |
New Jersey (P.E.) | New Mexico (P.E.) | New York (P.E.) |
North Carolina (P.E.) | North Dakota (P.E.) | Ohio (P.E. Self-Paced) |
Oklahoma (P.E.) | Oregon (P.E.) | Pennsylvania (P.E.) |
South Carolina (P.E.) | South Dakota (P.E.) | Tennessee (P.E.) |
Texas (P.E.) | Utah (P.E.) | Vermont (P.E.) |
Virginia (P.E.) | West Virginia (P.E.) | Wisconsin (P.E.) |
Wyoming (P.E.) |